kiley is talking about the importance of funding

rick: appreciate the progress that has been made, and how much we know

rick: there are some people who are great at navigating funding calls, we need to get them involved

challenge is reviewers get conflicted out

so people who know/care are conflicted out. challenging paradox!

Elena: comment on how to increase participation. think about undergraduates

undergrads often don't have technical background and express reluctance to try

Thanks for the live feed, Heidi. I can hear the panelists very well, but not the audience!

and institutions resist testing new/open platforms (e.g., teach SPSS instead of R)

Casey: we're applying for funding for summer school

virtual inclusive training for methods

I have a comment

Related is the Collaborative Replication and Education Project: https://osf.io/wfc6u/Open large-scale collaboration for undergraduate methods courses

Brandon: Q about how to incentivize this for grad students (esp. wrt speed)

rick: some hiring committees are making open science a requirement

Rick's hiring committee is having candidates comment on open science

Casey: in his department, there have been discussions about candidates being good team players and “open science citizens"

Martha: things that senior people can do to change process, students and ECRs can lobby to emphasize importance of their work within collaborative projects

Kiley: prosthyletizing at all levels is important

I'd like to chime in too, Heidi :)

Mark: what is our target scale for collaborative science?

Casey: even though we're talking about big team science today, he's also had amazing "little team science" experiences

Kiley: we can take what we learn in big collaborations to our own individual work

rick: size is least important. robustness, rigorousness, etc are most important

Thanks so much everyone!

Thanks all!T